Current Summary of Topics

000 - FORMATTING (1) 1961 (1) 1978 (1) 1979 (2) 1982 (2) 1983 (2) 1985 (1) 1986 (1) 1987 (2) 1988 (1) 1990 (1) 1991 (2) 1992 (2) 1994 (1) 1995 (1) 1997 (1) 1998 (1) 2001 (2) 2002 (1) 2003 (1) 2004 (2) 2005 (4) 2008 (1) BA model (1) Beach data (1) betweenness centrality (1) BKS studies (1) book (2) boundary specification (9) centrality (5) centralization (2) chapter (6) closeness centrality (1) cognitive psychology (1) cognitive social structures (1) confidentiality (3) consultation (1) data collection (4) data quality (1) data structure (1) degeneracy (1) degree centrality (1) density (2) djf (1) egocentric networks (1) empirical study (8) ergm (1) event-based strategies (1) exchange networks (1) expanding selection (1) fixed list selection (1) Frat data (1) generalized small-world networks (1) generative models (1) graph theory (1) hidden populations (4) history (1) human subjects protection (3) immediate effects centrality (1) infectious disease (1) informant accuracy (2) institutional review board (2) introduction (2) journal (25) jrh (12) k-cores (1) kad (1) Karate Club data (1) longitudinal analysis (1) Lunch data (1) management disclosure contract (1) measurement (3) mediative effects centrality (1) methodology (11) multiple name generator (4) network sampling (5) new science of networks (1) Office data (1) Old South data (1) organizations (2) overview (3) p* (1) positional generators (3) positional strategy (4) power (1) R (1) range (1) recall bias (1) relational approach (1) reputational method (1) research design issues (1) research ethics (3) respondent-driven sampling (3) review (1) review of field (3) reviewed (12) sample weighting (1) scale-free network (1) single name generator (2) SIR model (1) size (1) small groups (1) small-world network (1) snowball sampling (2) social capital (1) social structure (1) software (1) specification (1) statnet (1) status (1) strategic alliances (1) strong ties (1) structural analysis (1) subgroups (1) Tech data (1) theory (2) tie strength (1) total effect centrality (1) transitivity (1) truly informed consent (1) unreviewed (21) visualization (1) Watts-Strogatz model (1) weak ties (1)

Search The SNARL

2010-09-14

bogartti_molina_2005_journal

CITATION: Borgatti, Stephen P. and Jose-Luis Molina. 2005. “Toward ethical guidelines for network research in organizations.” Social Networks 27(2): 107-117.


AUTHOR_1: Stephen P. Borgatti
AUTHOR_2: Jose-Luis Molina
YEAR: 2005
TITLE: Toward ethical guidelines for network research in organizations
SOURCE: Journal
SOURCE_TITLE: Social Networks

SUMMARY: The authors continue the work begun in Borgatti and Molina (2003), in which they discuss the various ethical issues that are unique to the collection and analysis of social network data in the context of organizations. In particular, the issue of what data are disclosed to management and how these data or results are subsequently used by management are of major concern to the researcher. First, because the short-term validity of responses is at risk if participants begin to view participation as dangerous in career terms. Second, because the long-term viability of network research is increasingly compromised if researchers cannot obtain the voluntary participation and unbiased cooperation of respondents. As in the 2003 piece, major issues that make Social Network Analysis unique on ethical grounds are discussed. A major conclusion and extension put forward in this article is that research in organizations fundamentally involves three parties, not two: the researcher, each subject, and the organization itself. Therefore, it is suggested that researchers develop separate contracts and forms for both the participants and the organization that explicitly spell out the expectations and the provisions for the protection of individual participants throughout the course of the study. Examples and templates for these forms are provided as appendices.

REVIEWED BY: jrh

LABELS_FULL: 2005, journal, jrh, reviewed, research ethics, confidentiality, organizations, human subjects protection, management disclosure contract, truly informed consent, deductive disclosure, institutional review board

No comments:

Post a Comment